Friday, April 3, 2009
Terry Schiavo Memorial
As I was reading Wednesday's News-Press, I read an article that was sort of a blast from the past. Tuesday, March 31 was the four year anniversary of the death of Terry Schiavo, a Tampa Bay woman who was in a vegetative state for the final years of her life. It was interesting to read because I remember watching the court battle in the news as it happened. But what really struck me about the article was how one-sided and biased it seemed to be in favor of continuing Terry Schiavo's life, even four years after her death. One quote in particular verified this, "Sitting just inches from her bedside at the hospice were flowers, he said, soaking up water Schiavo was not permitted to drink. Children, Pavone said, were arrested for trying to bring bottles of water to a dying Schiavo." The article doesn't mention the counterargument anywhere, which annoyed me, since I was a supporter of ending her painful life, since she was not likely to recover.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
That really is a horribly written article. I especially like this paragraph:
ReplyDelete"
The battle to keep Schiavo alive started in the hospital room and moved to the court room, later progressing to the Legislature, governor's office, U.S. Supreme Court, Capitol Hill, White House and eventually the Vatican.
"
As if the Vatican were the highest authority.
It's not surprising there are shitty journalists out there willing to play PR for their hosts. It's even less surprising the amount of crybaby'ing Ave Maria is doing.
The Catholic Church seems ready to 'save lives' in any case, be they mineral, vegetable, or the product of rape-incest [http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/03/11/brazil.rape.abortion/].
Luckily Web 3.0 (hurr durr) saves the day. It's gratifying to see as many comments against a sappy human interest story as there are on that page.